OPINION: Nisman spent 11 years seeking justice for his fellow Argentines

Firefighters and rescue workers search through the rubble of the Buenos Aires Jewish Community centre in July 1994.
Firefighters and rescue workers search through the rubble of the Buenos Aires Jewish Community centre in July 1994.

By David Safir, International Division, Board of Deputies

Many of Argentina’s 200,000 Jews are descended either from Russian pedlars who fled pogroms to become gauchos on land acquired by Baron de Hirsch or from Holocaust survivors welcomed by Juan Peron (alongside Nazi fugitives!) to a bountiful nation once the fourth richest on earth.

Jews are socially and politically well-integrated and Argentines are as likely to claim César Milstein or Daniel Barenboim as “one of ours” as they are Chris de Burgh or Lionel Messi.

When 85 people were killed by the bomb that devastated the AMIA Jewish Community Centre in 1994, they were mourned as fellow Argentines; and it was the Archbishop of Buenos Aires (now Pope Francis) who drafted the petition that persuaded President Néstor Kirchner in 2004 to revive an investigation and seek justice for the victims of the deadliest ever terrorist attack on Argentine soil.

The appointed investigator (Alberto Nisman) was so diligent that, within two years, Interpol had issued “red flag” warrants to apprehend the prominent Iranians and Hezbollah agents suspected of planning and carrying out the attack. Iran denied involvement.

The Argentine governments’ preoccupation with recurrent economic crises cynically used widely-publicised disputes between Jewish communal bodies as an excuse to allow Nisman’s files to gather dust.

Moreover, while British politicians are encouraged to “connect with ordinary people” and expected to show resolve and convene Cobra [a crisis response committee], the default response of Argentina’s President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner (when rebuffed over the Falklands, ordered to repay US bondholders or upstaged by the leaders of Brazil and Chile) seems to be to share her feelings on social media.

So it was that when Nisman was found dead on the eve of telling a congressional committee that the unconstitutional “truth commission” set up in 2013 by the president and foreign minister was a fig leaf for a deal whereby Argentina would call off Interpol [granting immunity to several indicted Iranians] in return for cheap oil. So it was the president appeared neither sorrowful nor shocked at the tragic death of a public servant, but simply tweeted: “Why would he want to kill himself?” as if blogging about a soap opera cliffhanger.

When subsequent forensic analysis suggested Nisman had been murdered, she tweeted again. Ignoring the despairing public’s yearning for truth and justice (not only for Nisman but for the 85 people killed in the AMIA attack), she chose to air the first of her many conspiracy theories.

 

Mr Nisman

Arguing that former spies in the pay of her right-wing political opponents had fed Nisman false information to discredit her, she concluded that while his death was “sad”, their treachery was “the real scandal”.

She went on to point the finger at the colleague who gave Nisman a gun, the police who failed to protect him and even the journalist reporting his death. Commentators soon began to ask whether the president was actually losing her grip on it; and her promise to disband the SIDE intelligence service “out of control for 30 years” was met with derision. Numbers can never adequately measure or describe the loss of a life cut short, but graffiti such as “Nisman is victim 86” and “one dead, 40 million injured” spoke poignantly to the anguish of a traumatised nation.

However, while the Paris attacks brought millions on to the streets to claim “Je suis Charlie” and the tragic silencing of Nisman saw thousands chanting “Yo soy Nisman” in Plaza de Mayo, Argentina’s Jews declined to attend Holocaust memorial events with the (Jewish) foreign minister accused of using the murder of 85 Jews by Hezbollah in 1994 as a bargaining chip with Iran in 2013.

The recent attack on a mountain lodge popular with Israeli backpackers sadly recalled the Plan Andinia, a notorious forgery that claimed Jews planned to colonise Patagonia and “build a second Jewish homeland”.

Overt anti-Semitism is rare in today’s Argentina. Many Jews emigrated for political reasons during the military dictatorship, many more have left (for Spain or the USA rather than Israel) because of perennial economic crises.

As rumours and conspiracy theories abound, the one certainty is that Nisman spent 11 years seeking truth and justice for fellow Argentine citizens and lost his life before he could finish the job.

It is not only the AMIA victims and their families who deserve justice, but a nation of 40 million, which deserves and expects its leaders to restore their self-respect.

read more:
comments