Judge examines Rachel Riley libel claim
Pre-trial submissions heard over pending case between Countdown presenter and blogger Michael Sivier
A High Court judge heard pre-trial submissions on Wednesday over a pending libel case between the TV presenter Rachel Riley and the blogger and activist Michael Sivier.
Mr Sivier published an article on his website, “Vox Political, politics for the people”, on January 26 2019, entitled “Serial abuser Rachel Riley to receive ‘extra protection’— on grounds that she is receiving abuse”. He contended that the narrative of Ms Riley as a victim, as portrayed in the press, was wrong and suggested that she, and the actress Tracy-Ann Oberman, had spearheaded on-line abuse themselves against a 16-year-old girl.
In a complex ruling in a “Determination of Meaning” hearing, Mr Justice Nicklin told barristers David Mitchell, for Mr Sivier, and William Bennett QC for Ms Riley, that he accepted that some parts of Mr Sivier’s article were factual allegations, and that others were opinion. He ruled that Mr Sivier’s description of Ms Riley as having acted “obscenely by subjecting a vulnerable 16-year-old girl to serial abuse and has recklessly acted in such a way as to encourage her followers to make death threats against the girl and to subject her to an appalling amount abuse” was a factual allegation.
But the judge said that he believed other parts of Mr Sivier’s comments fell into the category of opinion. At one point Mr Sivier wrote: “I’m not saying Ms Riley intentionally tried to get her followers to threaten this girl with death, But nobody can deny that her irresponsibility has encouraged others to do so, and that she has been reckless as to the consequences of her behaviour”. Mr Justice Nicklin declared this to be an opinion, and therefore not subject to the claim of libel. Mr Sivier also called Ms Riley a “hypocrite” which the judge said was “a value judgment” on her conduct.
Much of Wednesday’s hearing was taken up with a detailed discussion of three “hyperlinks” in Mr Sivier’s article, two of which would take the reader to more than 100 pages of in-depth analysis by commentator Shaun Lawson of Ms Riley’s and Ms Oberman’s actions. But the judge said that the “ordinary reader” would have understood the broad factual allegations against Ms Riley without having to go on to read the Lawson arguments. “Only the most tenacious reader would have read those links”, he said.
Mr Sivier now has until January 29 2020 to prepare his full defence. He has launched a crowd-funding appeal to pay for his legal costs and representation.
Keep community journalism free.
Jewish News is free for everyone. No paywall. No barriers. Just trusted journalism for anyone who wants to stay connected to Jewish life in Britain.
If you value that, please support us.
From as little as £5 a month, you can help keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Every day, we report on the issues that matter to our community. We celebrate achievements, support charities, challenge antisemitism and ensure Jewish voices are heard more widely.
From as little as £5 a month, you can help us continue to:
- Report on the stories shaping Jewish life in the UK and beyond
- Bring our community together through shared stories, events and campaigns
- Celebrate the people, culture and moments that define our community
- Support organisations doing vital work across Jewish Britain
You can make a one-off donation or become a regular supporter. Every contribution helps keep our journalism free, independent and accessible to all.
If everyone who values Jewish News gave a small amount, it would make a real difference to our future.
