OPINION: Dropping of case against Jew-baiters was suspect
Author and barrister David Wolchover questions the competence of the Crown Prosecution Service after its failure to charge those accused of taking part in the now infamous 'hate convoy'.
When video imagery of the “hate convoy” travelling towards Golders Green went viral last year, it was widely assumed that the brazen Jew-baiting on show was graphic enough to assure swift justice. But, last week, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) declared, in its wisdom, that the evidence was insufficient.
Speaking to this newspaper, Nick Price, head of the CPS special crime and counter-terrorism division, explained that the “captured footage” was inadequate to prove in court that one of the two charged men was in the car at the time or that the other had participated in the obnoxious conduct.
By way of “clarification”, the CPS lamely declared it had “explored all options.” Yet those who practice regularly in the criminal courts will be puzzled as to why it took an unconscionable 18 months plus to drop what should have been a relatively straightforward case.
The Community Security Trust (CST) conceded that it “understand[s] the legal reasons” for not proceeding, but complained that the criminal justice system had failed in its core task. Yet if the legal reasons are sound, how can the system have failed? The CST didn’t say, but there is actually a ready explanation – one that goes to the root of the fundamental test the CPS is required to apply in all cases.
Its “full code test,” as the rule is called, requires crown prosecutors to allow a case to proceed only if (a) they consider that a jury applying notionally objective criteria in assessing the evidence would be more likely than not to convict, and (b) only then if it is in the public interest to continue.
Interestingly, Mike Freer, my own MP, avowed that even if the evidence did not meet the basic threshold test “sometimes we should take a chance and let a jury decide”. His instinct was dead on. And it is for that reason that over a number of years I have been calling for a change in the rule to reflect Mike’s sentiment.
Only two months after the ‘hate convoy’ made its sickening way along Finchley Road, I explained in a New Law Journal article how a simple tweaking of the threshold test would alter the whole landscape, particularly in the context of the shockingly low number of rape prosecutions.
Over the broad spectrum of criminal cases involving named suspects, the evidence will be of medium-range strength such that a trial outcome can go either way. But the threshold test involves a wholly artificial exercise in guessing the likely tilt on a fine balance. Countless cases that could well succeed fall by the wayside when they might otherwise easily have ended in an entirely respectable conviction. A far better test would prevent a trial from going forward if a conviction were considered significantly less likely than an acquittal. The “50 per cent rule” is arbitrary and worthless. We sent a copy of our article to Max Hill KC, the director of public prosecutions, calling upon him to change the rule, a discretionary power he enjoys.
There was no response, even to a chaser. They just do not want to know.
In fact, it is doubtful if the evidence was as insufficient as the CPS made out. In over half a century of practice at the criminal bar, I have defended in countless trials where the evidence of identification was primarily based on video imagery of indifferent quality. Nowadays enhancement technology can work wonders. And, as for proven presence in a car, it will often be sufficient in itself to establish complicity in an offence committed by fellow occupants during the journey. The CPS decision is highly suspect.
Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.
For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.
Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.
You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.
100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...
Engaging
Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.
Celebrating
There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.
Pioneering
In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.
Campaigning
Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish Newsalso produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.
Easy access
In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.
Voice of our community to wider society
The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.
We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.
