Board of Deputies appeal panel upholds sanctions on FT letter Deputies

36 Deputies signed a letter published by the Financial Times strongly criticising the Israeli government; many incorrectly thought this represented the Board's official stance

Board of Deputies representatives and staff
Board of Deputies representatives and staff

A Board of Deputies Appeal Panel has upheld the decision reached by the organisation’s constitution committee earlier this summer to impose sanctions on 36 of its Deputies, in what it has described as a “final” ruling in the case of an open letter they had signed published by the Financial Times six months ago.

In a statement from the Board today, the organisation said that following “a review of all the original materials and the responses submitted by the signatories of the letter” an independent panel had upheld the decision to send warning letters to 31 Deputies. It also said that the appeal panel had “upheld the findings that five Deputies exacerbated the breach of the Code of Conduct with additional steps that promoted the letter.”

In mid-April, 36 Deputies signed a letter published by the Financial Times, which strongly criticised the Israeli government, claiming that rather than continuing to engage in diplomacy, it had chosen to “break the ceasefire and return to war in Gaza”.

The letter said that “Israel’s soul is being ripped out and we, members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, fear for the future of the Israel we love and have such close ties to,” the letter said. “Silence is seen as support for policies and actions that run contrary to our Jewish values.”

The Board subsequently received widespread criticism from people within the Jewish community who assumed that the letter had been endorsed and supported by the organisation itself. Other Jewish people, both in the UK and Israel, supported the letter and would criticise the Board for its attempts to make it clear that the wording expressed did not represent the official stance of the organisation.

The Board of Deputies faced significant criticism from within the Jewish community as a result, with many incorrectly assuming the organisation had endorsed and supported the letter. Some within the Jewish community, however, both in the UK and Israel, supported the letter, and subsequently condemned the Board for distancing itself from it.

While originally the judgement handed out to five Deputies was to suspend them for two years, that time has been shortened to eighteen months – which in the case of four Deputies can be reduced to six months if the Deputies in question make a suitable apology to the organisation by the end of October. One of those four Deputies has since left the Board.

The five Deputies who received more stringent penalties were Harriett Goldenberg, who had been serving as vice chair of the Board’s International Division. The other four are Philip Goldenberg, a lawyer and longstanding Liberal Democrat councillor, Baron Frankel – chief executive of the Portland Trust, Robert Stone and Rebecca Singerman-Knight.

The Appeal Panel also upheld the original judgement’s verdict that the five would be subject to “removal where applicable from additional elected positions within the Board.” Apart from Harriett Goldenberg, others of the five had also been members of the organisation’s International Division, with those seats now confirmed to have been vacated.

As with the original ruling in June, the Board has stressed that the sanctions have not been imposed due to what the Deputies said, but how they said it – believed to refer to how not enough was done to make it clear to the wider public that this was not the official view of the Board.

“In line with the original panel, the Appeal Panel emphasised that Deputies have the right to represent their individual views and those of their communities freely”, the Board’s statement said.

“The breaches of the Code of Conduct did not refer to content of the letter but the way the signatories promoted it. “

read more: