Chief Rabbi emails MPs outlining his objection to assisted dying ahead of Commons vote
search

The latest Jewish News

Read this week’s digital edition

Click Here

Chief Rabbi emails MPs outlining his objection to assisted dying ahead of Commons vote

Proposed legislation allowing strictly controlled assisted dying prompts intense debate within the community

Lee Harpin is the Jewish News's political editor

It is no coincidence that demands for a change to the law are driven by individuals with direct, desperate and personal experience
It is no coincidence that demands for a change to the law are driven by individuals with direct, desperate and personal experience

Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis has emailed MPs outlining his objections to legalising assisted suicide just days before Friday’s debate on the proposed legislation in the House of Commons.

In an email sent to MPs, Rabbi Mirvis said he felt a “moral obligation” to speak out about a proposal which would “impose a new and immeasurable pressure upon terminal patients who are already extremely vulnerable.”

Jewish News had revealed earlier this month how Mirvis was joining with other faith leaders who were voicing  opposition  to the Assisted Dying Bill, sponsored by the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater.

But whilst Judaism has traditionally been against euthanasia, ahead of this week’s second reading of the bill, some rabbis and other leading Jewish figures, including doctors and politicians,  have questioned the traditional stance.

A spokesperson for Progressive Judaism co-leaders, Rabbi Josh Levy and Rabbi Charley Baginsky, left the way open for individual rabbis to reach their own opinion on assisted dying.

It said:”Within our movement, some rabbis emphasise the Jewish teaching that life is a gift from God, sacred and inviolable, and that any deliberate ending of life risks transgressing this divine trust.

“Others draw on equally compelling Jewish values, such as compassion for those who are suffering and the primacy of human dignity.

“There are also those who do not oppose assisted dying in principle, but have specific concerns about its implementation, or whether this can be introduced at a time of crisis in our public services, including in social and palliative care.

“This diversity of opinion is why we, as Co-Leads of Progressive Judaism, have chosen not to sign the open letter released by other faith leaders opposing changes to end-of-life laws. We have also chosen not to sign letters, when asked, in favour of a change.

“While we respect the conviction of those who sign, and campaign, on both sides of this debate – we believe it is essential to acknowledge the nuance and complexity.”

Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis

In the week leading up to the debate, Chipping Barnet MP Dan Tomlinson revealed he had attended two town hall gatherings: one with constituents in favour and one with those against.

Hundreds attended one event at  Finchley Reform Synagogue to hear speakers, including the Tory peer Lord Finkelstein, argue the case for assisted dying.

One of the organisers of the shul event, Andrew Jacobs, 70, told the BBC he would “be very disappointed” if Tomlinson did not vote in favour of the bill on Friday.

Jacobs said he backed assisted dying after seeing his mother’s struggle during her final days. “She told me, ‘my body is a burden to me. If I were a pet, you’d put me down’,” he said.”Seeing a loved one in distress, it’s really hard.”Tomlinson revealed later he remains undecided on what he says will be “the hardest decision of his political career”.

Rabbi Baroness Julia Neuberger unveils the newly restored drinking fountain

The Government has adopted a “neutral” position, with MPs and ministers given a free vote after Friday’s private members bill debate.

Supporters of the bill argue it has strict safeguards to prevent coercion and would give people a choice over how they die to avoid unnecessary suffering.

They claim it allows terminally ill adults expected to die within six months to seek help to end their own life.

Rabbi Jonathan Romain, the ex rabbi of Maidenhead Synagogue, is the chair of Dignity in Dying, a campaign group lobbying for a change in the law.

In a series of interviews Romain explained he had changed his mind on the issue, mainly as a result of hospital visits in which seriously ill patients wished to end their lives.

Romain has been among those advising the MP Leadbetter over legislation, pointing out the need for strict safeguards.

“You will need two doctors to examine you and for you to be terminally ill,” explained the rabbi.

“This system has been going on in Oregon for 27 years. It has worked well, there hasn’t been a dramatic uptake. I thought we have to catch up with a system that’s been working successfully.

“Frankly, everywhere I go, whether synagogues or other places, I find I’m pushing at an open door. I expect to be heckled but I’m absolutely not.”

Rabbi Jonathan Romain, Pic: Twitter/X

The former senior rabbi of West London Synagogue Baroness Neuberger also said she had changed  her mind on the issue “given the way healthcare has gone, and given that we are ageing longer.”

She added:”I think there are times when individuals find their suffering unbearable.

“I think it’s really important to keep healthcare professionals out of this but there are limited circumstances where it should be permitted.”

But Rabbi Dr. Shlomo Brody, the executive director of Ematai, an organisation that helps members of the community with issues around death, has joined Rabbi Mirvis in voicing series objections to the assisted dying bill.

Writing for the JC, Brody took issue with the data used from those supporting the bill from Oregan over a 25 year period.”

A systematic review of twenty-five years of data from Oregon, cited by Romain and others as an example of a system that is ‘working successfully,’ in fact points to disturbing trends,” claimed Brody.

“The length of the doctor-patient relationship reduced over time, the review shows, falling from 18 weeks, on average, in 2010, to 5 weeks in 2022.

“The proportion referred for psychiatric evaluation prior to assisted suicide has dropped from 31.3% to 1.1%.

“This means that no one is truly examining their physical and mental health before providing them with means to take their lives.”

But one of the most interesting interventions in the debate over the bill has come from the Jewish MP Peter Prinsley, an NHS consultant surgeon himself, who said even with “the most skilful palliative care”, some terminally ill people can suffer from “intolerable” symptoms.

The Bury St Edmunds MP argued assisted dying should be viewed as “complementary” to palliative care, rather than as an “alternative” service.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I can tell you that there are people who, even with the most skilful palliative care, get into a situation where their symptoms become intolerable and where they have a complete loss of control and dignity.”

Dame Margaret Hodge, who stepped down as an MP at the election, but who remains an influential voice on many issues added:”I’m at an age where, sadly, I’ve seen too much death.

“And I’ve seen cases where palliative care, no matter how good, cannot ease the pain & suffering of someone dying.

“Kim Leadbeater’s strict bill gives people the choice to have a good death. We all deserve this choice.”

Jim Shannon (DUP), David Robinson (Board of Deputies), Laura Marks (Mitzvah Day), Dan Tomlinson (Labour), Peter Prinsley (Labour), Guy Dabby-Joory (JLC), Tom Morrison (Lib Dem

The Office of the Chief Rabbi has historically spelt out serious objections within Orthodox Judaism to acts that speed up the end of a person’s life.

In 2005, at a parliamentary selection committee the Chief Rabbi’s Office quoted Rabbi JD Bleich, an expert on Jewish law and ethics, who had written:”Any positive act designed to hasten the death of the patient is equated with murder in Jewish law, even if the death is hastened only by a matter of moments.”

Outlining his position on the Terminally Ill Adults Bill to the Jewish News earlier this month Rabbi Mirvis said:“The quest to bring peace to those who are suffering unimaginable pain is a noble one – undoubtedly rooted in compassion and empathy.“But this proposed law will have the unintended consequence of creating at least as much anguish as it alleviates.

“The burden it would place on our most vulnerable patients, on their families and on medical staff, as well as the profound effect on the conscience of those left behind, is surely too high a price to pay.

“The devastating evidence from other countries is clear: when we numb, or remove altogether, our reverence for the precious gift of life itself, we withdraw from a moral standard, to which we might never return.”

In his email to MPs Mirvis said said evidence from Oregon, upon which the legislation is modelled, suggested that almost half of those choosing to end their lives “cite the encumbrance upon their friends and family as one of their reasons”.

He said evidence from Oregon, upon which the legislation is modelled, suggested that almost half of those choosing to end their lives “cite the encumbrance upon their friends and family as one of their reasons”.

Warning of a ‘slippery slope’ Mirvis said that in Belgium and the Netherlands it ‘did not take long for ‘mental anguish’ to become a legal and legitimate cause for assisted dying’.

Sarah Sackman, left, Shabana Mahmood, centre, Richard Hermer, right

Some of the most senior members of government  have expressed differing views, with Health Secretary Wes Streeting expressing opposition to legalising assisted dying on the grounds that the palliative care system in the UK was not good enough to offer patients a real choice.

Three former Tory prime ministers – Liz Truss, Boris Johnson and Theresa May – have now added their voices to ex-Labour PM Gordon Brown in opposition to the plans.

Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has previously supported assisted dying but has not said how he will vote on Friday.

On Saturday, Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, wrote to her constituents to warn that MPs would be putting the country on a “slippery slope towards death on demand” if the Bill passed.

In response, Lord Falconer, the former Labour justice secretary, told Sky News that Mahmood, who is a Muslim, was “motivated by her religious beliefs” and that these “shouldn’t be imposed on everybody else”.

Falconer’s comments were condemned by some in the Jewish community.

Support your Jewish community. Support your Jewish News

Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.

For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.

Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.

You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.

100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...

Engaging

Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.

Celebrating

There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.

Pioneering

In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.

Campaigning

Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish Newsalso produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.

Easy access

In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.

Voice of our community to wider society

The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.

We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.

read more: