Supreme Court rejects appeal by two charged with supporting Hamas
The UK's highest judicial authority rejected the argument that elements of terror legislation contravened the European Convention on Human Rights
The UK Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by individuals accused of expressing support for Hamas, which attempted to suggest a section of the UK’s Terrorism Act was incompatible with European Convention on Human Rights’ Freedom of Expression laws.
In a unanimous decision on Thursday from the five senior judges hearing the case, the notion that the terms of section 12(1A) Terrorism Act 2000 represented a disproportionate interference with the appellant’s rights under Article 10 of the ECHR was dismissed. Neither of the appellants have yet had their cases heard, meaning that the Supreme Court named neither of them directly in its ruling.
The first individual, designated by the Supreme Court as “ABJ”, was arrested on 12 October 2023 in connection with a speech she had made at a Palestine Solidarity Campaign event in Brighton on 8 October, regarding what had happened in Israel the previous day. In a separate incident, the second individual, designated “BDN” had held up a placard outside Downing Street on 17 October, after which he made a speech through a loudhailer. He was arrested later that day elsewhere in the Westminster area.
Both were subsequently charged with “expressing support for a proscribed organisation contrary to section 12(1A) Terrorism Act 2000”.
Further details regarding the case relating to each of the appellants can be read in section 2 of the Supreme Court’s judgement.
The decision means that, as stated by Lord Reed of Allermuir, President of the Court, “there is no need for trial courts to carry out separate proportionality assessments to ensure that each defendant’s conviction [in the event of a guilty verdict] is compatible with article 10.”
While a part of Hamas was proscribed in 2001, the group was proscribed in its entirety as a terrorist organisation in 2021, following an assessment, as the Supreme Court said in its written judgement, “that there was no sound reason to distinguish between Hamas’s military and political wings”.
Speaking to Jewish News, an individual who filmed “ABJ” speaking at the PSC event in October 2023 described the Supreme Court’s judgment as “a huge relief”.
“I have felt failed by the legal system again and again”, he said. “Now I feel like we might get justice.”
As of the time of writing, there is no indication regarding a trial date for either of the two individuals charged.
Keep community journalism free.
Jewish News is free for everyone. No paywall. No barriers. Just trusted journalism for anyone who wants to stay connected to Jewish life in Britain.
If you value that, please support us.
From as little as £5 a month, you can help keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Every day, we report on the issues that matter to our community. We celebrate achievements, support charities, challenge antisemitism and ensure Jewish voices are heard more widely.
From as little as £5 a month, you can help us continue to:
- Report on the stories shaping Jewish life in the UK and beyond
- Bring our community together through shared stories, events and campaigns
- Celebrate the people, culture and moments that define our community
- Support organisations doing vital work across Jewish Britain
You can make a one-off donation or become a regular supporter. Every contribution helps keep our journalism free, independent and accessible to all.
If everyone who values Jewish News gave a small amount, it would make a real difference to our future.
