Sarah Cotte, 22, offered “unconditional solidarity” with the Palestinian armed resistance during a speech outside a London college on October 9 2023, the Old Bailey was told.
The prosecution had asserted that even though she did not name Hamas, her comments at the gathering publicised on Instagram were “thinly veiled references” to it.
Cotte had denied that her comments were about Hamas, saying she had been supporting “the right to resist”.
Following a week-long retrial, Cotte, from Camden, north London, was found not guilty of expressing support for a proscribed organisation.
At an earlier trial, she was found not guilty of a second charge of expressing support for Hamas on a WhatsApp group.
Throughout her first trial in the summer and subsequent retrial in September, pro-Palestine activists had staged vocal protests outside the Old Bailey.
In October 2023, Cotte had been a 19-year-old student reading politics, philosophy and economics at the School of Oriental and African Studies (Soas), which is part of the University of London.
On 9 October 2023, she gave a speech to a rally of between 60-70 people outside Soas in which she expressed “unconditional solidarity with the Palestinian armed resistance”, jurors were told.
Using a megaphone, she said Palestinians had “broken free” and were rising “against the Zionist state which has been bleeding Palestine dry for nearly 80 years”.
At the end of the speech, which was filmed, there were chants of: “Intifada revolution”.
Seven days later, Cotte made a comment to 113 members of a WhatsApp group for the Fight Racism Fight Imperialism (FRFI) society, of which she was a member.
She had been taking part in a discussion on WhatsApp about the views of left-wing commentator Owen Jones.
During the discussion, Cotte wrote: “The only way for innocent people to stop dying is for the Palestinian Resistance to be victorious.”
Cotte was arrested on January 31 2024, the court heard.
Giving evidence, Cotte denied that she supported Hamas but said thought thought the deaths of civilians on October 7 “could be justified”.
She told jurors: “I think that the killing of civilians is always a tragedy. At the same time, I don’t think it is a surprise.
“I think saying it is understandable and agreeing with it is two different things, so I think it is understandable and could be justified.”
She added: “I don’t think it’s my role to impose conditions on the Palestinian people and their struggle.
“I don’t support Hamas and I have never supported Hamas. I was supporting the right to resist.”
The defendant claimed that fellow Soas students would know that when she spoke about Palestinian armed resistance she did not mean Hamas, but accepted she did not know everyone at the rally.
The jury deliberated for less than two hours on Friday to reach its not guilty verdict.
Keep community journalism free.
Jewish News is free for everyone. No paywall. No barriers. Just trusted journalism for anyone who wants to stay connected to Jewish life in Britain.
If you value that, please support us.
From as little as £5 a month, you can help keep our journalism free and accessible to all.
Every day, we report on the issues that matter to our community. We celebrate achievements, support charities, challenge antisemitism and ensure Jewish voices are heard more widely.
From as little as £5 a month, you can help us continue to:
- Report on the stories shaping Jewish life in the UK and beyond
- Bring our community together through shared stories, events and campaigns
- Celebrate the people, culture and moments that define our community
- Support organisations doing vital work across Jewish Britain
You can make a one-off donation or become a regular supporter. Every contribution helps keep our journalism free, independent and accessible to all.
If everyone who values Jewish News gave a small amount, it would make a real difference to our future.






















